Iraqi Public Opinion and the 1930 Agreement: Its Role and Impact on the Agreement

Iraqi Public Opinion and the 1930 Agreement: Its Role and Impact on the Agreement

Blog Article

The 1990 Agreement was the conclusion of a series of treaties and agreements concluded between the monarchy and Britain through which the British authorities exercised their colonial policy in Iraq from behind the veil of international legitimacy approved by the League of Nations in the name of the mandate.Many have written and researched various aspects of the development of Iraq from the First World War until independence in the 17th.However, the issue of Iraqi public opinion still jmannino.com lacks analytical research in its general and specific framework, and I will attempt in this research to study the development of Iraqi public opinion during the mandate in order to assess its role and impact on the progress of the negotiations that took place between the Iraqi and British sides during a few months.Exposing to the positions of the pillars and citizens of public opinion after the agreement was concluded is not feasible.

Therefore, the methodology of research will be using political science study methods, 730 sunken lake road and somewhat far from the traditional method of historical study.Defining the concepts becomes in this case an urgent necessity.Public opinion - at its best - is what James Price argued as the opinions practiced by a group of citizens with their own economic, political, social, cultural and religious opinions, which they express by supporting or opposing an idea or policy that the ruling factions adopt or seek to implement.Prause distinguishes three groups in public opinion, those who seriously deal with public affairs, namely, politicians, legislators, journalists, academics professors and civil servants, and despite their small number, they in fact form an opinion-making group.

There is a second group that will have a flag through political, social and media communications, and finally there are those who follow the prevailing opinion in the arena of public affairs.